Skip to content


Teaching American Literature with Arts and Crafts!

Arts and Crafts in my American Literature Classroom

Note: I don’t post about teaching much, not because I don’t want to, but because the privacy issues are complex. Today, a fun exception!

This week my American Novel class worked on “Bartleby, the Scrivener” (I know, it’s a stretch to call it a novel, but with Presidents’ Day on Monday, we had a short week, so it seemed to make sense.) I had intended to talk a lot about the nature of work in general, and office work in particular, but was struck by how very foreign the topics of Bartleby were. The type of work that Turkey, Nippers, and Bartleby were expected to do were just so completely outside the realm of my students’ worlds that some kinds of examination became difficult. Bear in mind, this is a generation that, increasingly, is not being taught to write in cursive! I am finding students here and there who can’t read cursive! So even the arts of the modern pen are being lost to them. I asked, and only one had ever written with a pen that needed dipping in an inkwell before. Well then.

Attack of the Craft Closet

It just so happens that whenever I have disposable time, lettering and non-elaborate calligraphy are two of my hobbies. So I have about a dozen stick pens and about twice as many nibs, and a few bottles of ink. I brought them in to class today. We started class in oppositions: I said I wanted first to talk about the ways we might read Bartleby allegorically, and then we would experiment with the nitty-gritty materiality of the action of the text.

Varying reactions

Pen and inkwell

Student photo of "these cool things" photo credit: Keishla Rivera

About 1/4 of the students were non-plussed: why make writing harder? And messier? They wrote a few words, put down their pens, and looked around for what was next. Several students struggled to make the thing work–lefties were especially thwarted by the technology. I hadn’t really thought about how much harder it must have been to be left handed in a time that required the use of such pens. I don’t know if there’s research out there, but I do bet there weren’t too many southpaw scribes on 19th Century Wall Street. Another minority was entranced. They wrote and wrote, and copied things. Wrote notes to friends. Two looked up letters and characters from other languages to see what it was like creating, for example, Chinese characters with this writing technology.

And another technological innovation

To round out my look into 19th (and earlier) century writing technologies, I also brought them some sealing wax. Only one had ever seen it before. Without (thankfully) setting off the smoke alarm, we sealed an envelope. We talked a little about sealing, and what the seal meant. Granted, seals don’t play a big role in Bartleby, but it seemed to contribute usefully to the discussion.

And I’d do it again!

I’ve never had an arts and crafts table in an English classroom before. But I do think that, particularly for teaching pre-20th Century works, an attention to paratextuality should maybe even require teaching something about the material world that these works are referencing. Although this course doesn’t touch the medieval period at all, while they were working with the pens I encouraged them to think about those pens in the context of a world without printing presses at all, not just without photocopy machines. A sobering thought, that seemed to be.

Two students tweeted pictures of the tools–one picture is on a locked feed and contains the student’s full names, I’ve included (with permission) the other one!

Posted in Profession, teaching, Tools.

Tagged with , , , .


Digital Humanities and Puerto Rican Studies

#TransformDH

The hashtag #transformDH has taken on a life of its own, and pretty soon I hope to have my chronicle of how it came to be up and readable, but for now, let me say that the mission statement of the #TransformDH Collective (as we have taken to calling ourselves) is “To use the methodological insights of queer and ethnic studies to produce a transformative effect on the digital humanities and produce a digital humanities that is itself transformative.” It was born out of a desire for more of a number of separate but interrelated things:

  • A wider diversity in the people who do DH
  • A wider diversity of topics and areas of DH inquiry
  • More communication and connection between people doing queer or ethnic studies DH work
  • And more…

For my own part, my interest was sparked by conference attendance. At MLA, ASATHATCamp and other conferences I’d been to, I had grown, over time, accustomed to seeing panels tweeted. I grew to appreciate the ability that twitter offered to follow some of the great moments, even if they were just textual soundbites, from panels I could not attend. When I got to the Puerto Rican Studies Association conference in 2010, tweeting conferences had become second nature to me, and tweet I did.

I was almost the only one. PRSA hadn’t chosen a hashtag, hadn’t coordinated, and we just didn’t create the online splash of even a regional THATCamp, despite being a conference several times the size. I started wondering why. This led me to propose the THATCampSoCal session “Diversity in DH.” We talked about a lot of things there, and some great things have sprung from that session, but I still haven’t been able to bridge the divide I see in two of my fields of interest.

Call for Participants

Together with some good twitter friends, I’m putting together a roundtable for the upcoming Puerto Rican Studies Association conference. (I moved at the last meeting, by the way, because #PRSA is taken by the Public Relations Society of America, the Puerto Rican Studies hashtag is now: #PRStudies.)

I’ve set up another google doc and would like to begin a large conversation. I have been working on the theories and practices of bilingual digital representation for a while–I am interested in how we represent bilingual texts online. Inspired by a conversation with Aurora Levins Morales, I realized that while my own project is important, it has a much more important place in the context of a larger project. Puerto Rican Studies, as a field, needs to have real and practical conversations about the digital projects that exist, and about the digital projects that need to exist. Let’s start talking about a digital museum and library of puertorriqueñidad.

Building a Team

I’ve been in contact with a few people with great Puerto Rican Studies digital projects, and I’m looking for more (do you know some? send them my way!). I’ve been in contact with people about the overlap between such a project and an even larger project–Latino/a? Latin American? The Americas? Please, if you are interested, leave a comment here, or send one through the comment form on the home page, or email me, or tweet @PhDeviate. If you’re interested in participating in the roundtable at the Puerto Rican Studies Association, let me know that as well, and I’ll give you edit privileges to the google doc.

Back to #TransformDH

This is the kind of project that we in the #TransformDH collective are envisioning. In this case, how can Digital Humanities transform the ways we publish, archive, disseminate, make available, and even translate Puerto Rican cultural production? And how could this project change the ways that Digital Humanities thinks of itself?

Posted in Profession, scholarship.

Tagged with , , , .


Excitement. Theory. Passion.

Somehow recently, I’ve been reading a lot of blog posts about blogging, like this one. Setting aside the obvious mise-en-abyme meta-ness of reading any, not to say many, blog posts about blogging, I’ve noticed a theme: excitement. Today (while getting a pedicure, what of it?) I was reading the introduction to Antonio Viego’s Dead Subjects: Toward a Politics of Loss in Latino Studies. As happens so frequently to me when I read really good scholarship, I have several aha! moments in rapid succession. These are the ones that came to me today. I hope you enjoy my excitement. I’ve been away from blogging for a while. I want to be back to it. Here we go–

It can be terribly destructive to declare movements “over”

Like a lot of literary-minded folks, I read with interest Stanley Fish’s recent piece in the New York Times about the upcoming (and about to start!) Modern Language Association Annual Convention, or as I will call it by its affectionate (at least to me) hashtag: #MLA12. He was talking about Digital Humanities, mostly, a topic about which I have strong opinions and feelings, an area of scholarly discourse and production with which I strongly ally myself. But in his text was a note that I found troubling at the time, and only in reading Viego did I identify my trouble. Fish writes:

Also absent or sparsely represented are the topics that in previous years dominated the meeting and identified the avant garde — multiculturalism, postmodernism, deconstruction, post-colonialism, neo-colonialism, racism, racialism, feminism, queer theory, theory in general.

It’s an interesting list he generates there. I shudder to think about what “racism” when placed in parallel with something like “deconstruction” might mean as a theoretical lens. (I imagine a more parallel term might have been “critical race theory.”) But that list compiled as it is reminded me, in conjunction with Viego’s passionate invocations of Lacanian psychoanalysis: I’m not done with theory yet. And I frankly don’t think I’m alone. The idea, prevalent throughout Fish’s piece that the various movements of theory have entered, left their marks, and then departed strikes me as profoundly troubling. (The idea that Digital Humanities is the next movement to start down this path strikes more scholars than myself as troubling.) It’s not because I want to cling desperately to an affection for de Man, or Lacan, or Freud, or any particular theorist. Nor is it because of a particular affection for theory itself, but for something I’ve felt deeply ever since I have known of the existence of theory:

Theory Saves Lives

Let’s accept, at least operationally, one of the basic theses of Viego’s book:

Critical race and ethnicity studies scholars have developed no language to talk about ethnic-racialized subjectivity and experience that is not entirely ego-and social psychological and that does not imagine a strong, whole, complete, and transparent ethnic-racialized subject and ego as the desired therapeutic, philosophical, and political outcome in a racist, white supremacist world. (4)

Now, I know that some of you out there are thinking that I’ve violated a lot of the laws of blogging here by including that long and “jargony” blockquote. But that’s one of my points here. This kind of articulation is precisely what fires me as a scholar. This is where my passion lies. And still, I frankly don’t think I’m alone.

Within this one quotation are a few things I find important:

    1. As critical race scholars, as scholars of race and ethnicity, as scholars of gender and sexuality, as scholars of any field of literary or cultural studies that values subjectivity, we must remember that no matter the strength of the hold of ego psychology, it’s not the only psychology out there.
    2. The reliance on the concept of wholeness is not only, as Viego continues, “the notion of subjectivity that [racist discourse] needs in order to function most effectively” but it is also the notion of subjectivity that keeps many of us distracted from issues of social justice, economic opportunity, and even scholarship in our search for it.
    3. The lack of engagement with psychoanalysis of most branches of critical race theory–and Viego gives an excellent list of exceptions (244n10)–is part of what allows a Stanley Fish to declare these things past

The ability to think new ways of thinking, to my mind, is one of the most important things that the humanities offers us. And one of the most important things that humans do. Theory enables us to think our lives, and thus, to live our lives.

I don’t know about you guys, but I need theory

My good friend S. Bear Bergman and I used to have wildly heated debates about theory. Ze would insist that nothing articulated in Judith Butler could not be derived from lived experience, and I would insist that if that point was true then I had never lived. Because it may be that I’m hopelessly cerebral (and surely that is a unique situation in the world of academia!), but I need theory–I need to read it and write it–in order to situate myself in the world at all.

Rarely has a book captured me so thoroughly with its title, and rarely has one delivered as thoroughly as this one on its promise. Thank you for reading.

Posted in rumination, scholarship.


Quick DHSI Wrap-up

I both hope and sincerely intend to write a longer post about my activities of this week. This week I’ve been at the the Digital Humanities Summer Institute. I took a weeklong seminar entitled “Digital Editions.” The quickest thing to say about it is that it was wonderful. I have had a project fomenting in my head ever since I went to THATCamp New England. It took me a while to name that project as a digital edition. But now I have named it. The amazing instructor, Meagan Timney helped us lay out all of the various things we should be thinking about moving into designing a digital edition.

We talked about project planning and design and the things one should be thinking about before ever starting. This part immediately made me feel at ease, since my chief concern coming in was that I wasn’t far enough along to make taking a course useful. She offered us a large range of questions which, she suggested, when answered, would usefully begin a grant application. (Tricky! And awesome!)

We then went into the various other elements–project planning and design, technical implementation, site design and usability, and other things like that. We were introduced to Islandora which is a tool being developed at the University of Prince Edward Island. This tool, in a sentence, makes a drupal front-end coordinate with a fedora commons repository back-end. For those of you reading this for whom that is unparseable, here’s my analog explanation: The fedora commons repository is a filing cabinet, which you can fill with many many sheets of paper. Drupal is a bulletin board on which you might like to display pieces of paper. Islandora will pull the correct sheets from the filing cabinet, and pin it to the bulletin board for you. Okay, it does more than that, but that’s my working analog explanation.

There will be more, but I’m trying to braindump just a little here. If you are interested in anything I’ve written here and would like to here more, ask questions!!

Posted in (un)conferencing, scholarship, Tools.

Tagged with , , , .


THATCamp SoCal — The crafts

Apologies to all for not writing this up sooner. This will be one of a few posts.

I went to THATCampSoCal!. Through a series of financial and friend-of-friend-related reasons, I also ended up staying with the organizer, Jana Remy. This gave me an interesting perspective on what it takes to host a THATCamp, and probably more than anything else increased my desire to do so sometime in the not-too-distant future. (And now, clearly, my allotment of hyphens for this post has been used up.)

THATCamp

For those who don’t know, THATCamp is an unconference. This format did not make a lot of sense to me at first, even all the way through the first THATCamp I went to, but someone (sorry, I do not recall who) explained it to me at this THATCamp as “You know when you go to a conference, and the Q & A after the panel leads to really exciting conversation in the hallway that really starts going somewhere just when you have to leave and go to the next panel? This is an attempt to organize an event just around those conversations.” This was the best explanation I’ve ever heard, and explains pretty thoroughly both what I like and don’t like about the format! Fortunately, what I don’t like is easily enough addressed by continuing to go also to traditional conferences. Some of the greatest ideas I’ve ever had, and some of the best work I’ve ever done has been inspired by sitting and listening to papers. I hear lots of people talk about “sitting and listening to papers” as if it is the 8th circle of hell for them–but I enjoy it. A lot! I think it’s an incredibly useful way to find out what people are doing and to get inspired to do things myself. However, this is not that. Or rather THAT is not that!

This THATCamp

Every THATCamp (really, like every conference!) is different. However, the thing that contributed more than anything else to the uniqueness of this THATCamp was the craft table. Craft table?? Penny Richards organized a craft table in the main room of the conference. She has written up her experience of it here, but I would like to expand a little on the comment I made to that post.

  1. First, one of the chief complaints I ever hear (or make!) about THATCamp is that it’s disorienting. Too much at once! Too many things going on! The spontaneity is both exhilarating (that’s the good) but also very easily overwhelming. I think this is related to the unconference vibe–because the sessions are not structured around, say, one person’s work, they lend themselves very well to drawing huge connections between widely and wildly disparate topics, ideas, texts, disciplines. This can leave one feeling as if one doesn’t know anything because one doesn’t know everything. (Never mind that no one in the room knows everything; it always seems like they do!). No matter how much we (academics, technologists, museum workers, and the other participants) sometimes feel ourselves to be creatures entirely of the brain–having a place to engage the body was just wonderful. The feeling of taking time out from THATCamp without actually leaving, or even without really tuning out, was lovely. Of course, if that were only it, a yoga room would have worked just as well!
  2. A chief reason why the craft table was so much better than a yoga room was in its relevance. Penny didn’t just bring “stuff.” A craft table… we could have been tie-dying, making bracelets, or making candles (the chief things I did in my years at summer camp…). Instead, she brought things entirely relevant to what we do–mostly collaging supplies. And not just any collaging supplies! She brought old, decommissioned card catalog cards, recycled miscellany (primarily cereal boxes) and a collection of photographs printed from Flickr Commons. Already, before anyone sat down, Penny’s table was a commentary on open access, bricolage, and the temporal boundedness of classificatory and cataloging systems. That’s quite a lot for one craft table! And the conversations bore that out. During the time that THATCamp was in session, a series of conversations (perhaps epitomized by this post, perhaps not) about the meaning of “building” in digital humanities was raging. I found the process of collaging (a form of art that, I think, has long since established itself as a form of art “creation,” which I’d submit as the art-equivalent of “building”) with physical objects to be a useful thought exercise in the meaning of building or creating. On the one hand, I didn’t “make” anything at that table. On the other hand, I made a name tag, a wall hanging, a button, and an inspirational bidirectional pocketfish! All of it was “just” putting pre-existing things together–”just” cutting and pasting–”just” arranging in space. And yet, it doesn’t feel like there was any “just” about it. I’m not really coming down with a clear stance on what is and what is not “building” in digital humanities, but I do know that if I ever do take a stand on that issue, it will be strongly influenced by my experience at that craft table.

In case you’re curious, here is the inspirational bidirectional pocketfish. I only have a picture of it in a unidirectional fashion right now…

Posted in (un)conferencing.

Tagged with , , .


I have a flyer!

I’m giving a talk at Suffolk University on Thursday. 1PM. I hope to see you there!

They made a lovely flyer. Click here to see or download it (pdf).

For the quick facts:

“My Dreams is Censored”: Poverty & Women in Black Artemis’

Picture Me Rollin’

Thursday, December 2nd at 1:00 p.m.

Poetry Center, Mildred F. Sawyer Library

From “Fallen Women” to the “Welfare Queen,” women living in poverty have often been stereotyped as causing their own poverty. Popular media portray poor women as all living on welfare, having too many children, and cheating the system. Black Artemis’ novel Picture Me Rollin’ tells a story of an ex-convict and her sister trying to avoid these very things—and finding themselves cheated by the system at every turn.  This talk will discuss Black Artemis’ novel in the context of several systems:  criminal justice, public assistance, and public education.

Refreshments will be served.

Posted in scholarship.

Tagged with , , , .


Writing Paralysis–First-Year Style

We’ve all had it. The blank page. The blank screen. Not so long ago, for me, it was a blank unlined sheet of white paper with a fast-growing trellis of little leaves  and flowers scrolling around the edge. More recently, it has been a blank Scrivener page  or Mellel  document. The first sentence written… the first sentence deleted…repeat.

Our  students have it too; whether they are doodling flowers or staring at the blank page  or doing what I refer to as “bouncing off the work” and spending time on Facebook or twitter… they have it too.

Recently, I happened upon an assignment that I’ve done before but somehow this time it struck a particular chord. Before asking for a draft, or even an outline of their next essay, I asked my students to send me an e-mail telling me what their plan was for writing this paper. I didn’t set the length requirement on the e-mail, nor was I very specific about what the e-mail should contain, but the responses I’ve gotten so far have been remarkable. Students whose essay writing is awkward and difficult to read have written me clear and well organized e-mails–e-mails in which the writing quality exceeds that in their essays by quite a lot.

When I first started teaching, I had the experience that I’m sure most new teachers have: I crafted what I believed to be an excellent assignment only to have the essays come back the universally disappointing. When every student in a class doesn’t do well on an assignment it isn’t a stretch to suspect that the assignment might be to blame. By the same token, when a critical mass of students do well in an area where they have not done well so far, perhaps we might also give the assignment some credit.

My only hypothesis so far is that the writing situation of drafting an e-mail is less stressful and that reducing the stress produces better writing. What I have to figure out how to communicate is how they can bring these more interesting, dynamic, and frankly grammatical voices into their other assignments. What is it that we, and here I’m including the elementary and secondary school teachers who have gotten their students to the first year in college, do to our students so that as soon as we say “this is an essay,” or “you will be graded on this,” the caliber of writing goes down? Is it only stress? Is it the legacy of essay tests? Is it the new SAT? I don’t know. But I would like to believe that all our students have it in them to find a voice that is both authentically theirs and up to the academic standards we try to set.

I’ve learned a lot of “magic words” in my life, but I have to admit that I never expected that “tell me your plan” would unlock so much.

And, though I don’t expect it, if any of my current students are reading this: good job!

Posted in Profession, rumination, teaching.

Tagged with , .


A Blog Post is Not a Dissertation Chapter

But, a dissertation chapter is a dissertation chapter.

The Sunday New York Times struck fear into my heart this week. This doesn’t happen every week, though goodness knows, more often than I’d like. This week brought us this headline:

‘Culture of Poverty’ Makes a Comeback

The problem here starts with the title: if the “Culture of Poverty” is making a scholarly comeback, then it is really time to start yelling in loud and boisterous protest. The quotation marks are important. Why?

“Culture of Poverty” vs culture and poverty

Or the cultural aspects of poverty, or the various behavioral contributory factors to poverty. Why are these rephrasings important? The “Culture of Poverty” is a phrase that was coined by Oscar Lewis, around 1959. In spite of what Laura Briggs suggests were his good intentions — “The full tragedy of this event was that Oscar Lewis was a socialist who favored government policies to ameliorate the lot of the poor and challenge colonialism” (Briggs 78) — Oscar Lewis’ theories and work have given rise to some of the most egregious attitudes of blaming the poor for their own poverty that the 20th century saw. Thus, to hear that his work is returning in the 21st fills me with horror.

I certainly don’t mean that behavior has nothing to do with poverty. And frankly, I’m neither an anthropologist nor a sociologist and have done no fieldwork on the issue. But this: “behavior affects poverty” is not Lewis’ thesis. His thesis was closer to, “sexual immorality and licentiousness, as well as a willful disregard of the excellent advice of their betters causes poverty.” I should think that any cursory glance through the celebrity tabloids would remind us that lots and lots of really wealthy people lead dissipated and licentious lives. And Lewis’ work, among others, helps obscure the fact that lots and lots of grindingly poor people lead lives of scrupulous sexual morality–many of them, I’d wager, just in order not to be branded with Lewis’ iron.

The problem with Lewis’ thesis was not that he was looking for connections between behavior and poverty–it’s that all of his answers were presupposed in his questions.

The good news

The good news is that this article finally got me around to posting a dissertation chapter, which I’d been meaning to do for a while. It’s not perfectly digitized (I was just reminded that links back from the footnotes would be nice), but it’s a start. This is my chapter on Piri Thomas’ Down These Mean Streets which I read alongside Oscar Lewis (among others). I welcome comments, critiques, and other types of thoughts. This New York Times article tells me that I really do have to get that chapter ready to publish somewhere, because we need to remember that the “Culture of Poverty” was debunked almost the moment it was first theorized by people in Lewis’ own field. Unfortunately, it was picked up mainly by politicians to promote the agenda they had in mind already: demonizing the poor.

So, yes, please study poverty! Examine it closely, and leave no stone unturned. But let that study not be a return to Oscar Lewis, except as a useful example of how scholarship can go painfully awry.

Posted in Profession, scholarship.

Tagged with , , .


The Academic Job Market and Tools

There isn’t much about the academic job or postdoc market that it’s appropriate to post publicly. I won’t mention where I’m applying, or who has listed jobs that sound exciting. Suffice it to say: there’s a market, and I’m on it.

The Problem

What I am noticing is what a complicated administrative endeavor being on the market is. I remember when I was in high school hearing of one or two students here and there who only applied to schools that would accept the common application. They filled out one application, applied to plenty of schools, and chose from among them. Unfortunately for, well, for all of us job-seekers, the academic job market is not very similar to the undergraduate admissions cycle. Ruling out places to apply because their requirements are non-standard is simply not an option. But it leaves me tracking lists like this:

Course proposals:

  • School 1:  (undergraduate 2pgs ea.)
  • School 2:  (1 course, 500 words)
  • School 3: (2 courses, one an undergraduate seminar)
  • School 4: (2 UG courses)
  • School 5: (1 UG course)

Statement of Research

  • School A: (2000 words)
  • School B: (4 pages)
  • School C: (1500 words)
  • School D: (no guideline)
  • School E: (1000 words)
  • School F: (no guideline)
  • School G:  (700-1000 words)
  • School H: (1,000-3,000 words)
  • School I: (no guideline)
  • School J:  (5 pages)
  • School K: (1500 words)

That is of course in addition to tracking the research on which departments and programs have which resources and people in order to make cover letters and proposals as detailed and personalized as possible. Of course there’s also tracking which places want 2, 3, 4, 5 letters of recommendation, which places want transcripts, how long a dissertation abstract they want, how long a writing sample, and the variables go on.

The Solutions Tools

As soon as I realized the scope of the work, I had a sudden overwhelming desire for a year between now and the deadlines to craft the perfect job application tool. I think it would be a MySQL backed database. I’d craft import filters from the various job lists I search. I’d standardize the fields for the different forms of information they request. I’d create elaborate “mail merge” type documents for inserting customized information into my materials. Alas, I don’t have anywhere near this application development skill (now!) and it quickly became clear that in the time allotted I could either craft a tool for this task or simply do the task.

(Ah “simply” that most misleading of words. Editing my dissertation, I learned to search for words like “simply,” “clearly,” and “obviously,” because wherever such words appeared, it usually signaled that I had no idea what I was writing in that moment. Something in my has a desire to adverbialize my way out of ambiguity. If I tell you it is simple, you will believe me. Never did work out that way.)

Taking the advice of the eminently wise people at ProfHacker, I first signed up for an Interfolio account. They will act as my dossier service, about which I’m excited–though I confess I would be more excited if two or three of the places I’m applying didn’t specifically say that they don’t accept materials from dossier services. However, once I have aggregated things there, I feel like it will streamline some of this process.

However, there’s still the question of what-all needs aggregating. In case I have never been clear in this space before, I have an abiding hatred for (almost) all things Microsoft, but until this year I had still been maintaining my CV in .doc format. I finally got frustrated with having to open Word for nothing in the world except editing my CV and copied it all into Mellel which is my primary word processor.

Word processing didn’t seem quite the right thing for these variably-lengthed but similarly themed writing projects, so I’m drafting my materials in Scrivener. Scrivener’s comfort with modularity allows me to construct documents as from legos… Include this clarification in a longer version, include this other paragraph only when I need extra conciseness. Scrivener exports lovely RTF documents, which import cleanly into Mellel for polishing. Mellel in turn will produce lovely PDFs which are ideal for delivery, printing, and uploading.

Of course, that still leaves me with the question of deadlines. It’s lovely to work as if polishing these documents were all that was important, but having them in on time counts for quite a lot as well! I have set up a separate project in Omnifocus for each job or postdoc I’m applying to. Each project has each type of material required as a separate task. I’m not 100% satisfied with this, because I’d like some better way to indicate the lists above. The same CV, for example, can often be sent to each program, whereas the cover letter is always different. So “CV” as a task represents a much different investment of time and energy than “cover letter.”

Lastly, I’m not applying in a vacuum. I am fortunate, or at least it feels fortunate to me, that my dissertation director is also our job market coordinator this year. I need to send her a list of applications and update it regularly. She does not need to see all the details of whether this position requires a 1000 or a 2000 word statement, so I dumped the tasks from Omnifocus into an Excel file (the one exception to my hatred of things Microsoft). This dump is not clean, and I’m really dissatisfied with it. I had to do a lot of editing to make the spreadsheet readable. The spreadsheet only contains: School, department, position, deadline, and URL of the listing. Unfortunately, while my director is entirely Excel savvy, she needs to have it in a format yet more people read, and thus, I found myself back to word, converting the Excel spreadsheet into a Word table. Frankly, I’m tired just looking at my process.

Shout Out

To the recent ProfHacker post about keeping track of job postings, which was one of the inspirations for this post. To the best of my knowledge, no one has written a post about the project management dilemma that is the job market, though, and so I humbly submit my contribution.

How are you tracking/have you tracked job market materials?

Posted in Profession, Tools.

Tagged with , , .


The Important/Urgent Matrix: A Monday Morning Post (on Tuesday)

Though it’s only been a rough goal, I have set myself a goal to post here about once a week. Further, I have set a timeframe for that goal: to post here on Mondays. Once a week feels manageable to me, and though I have not (yet!) built up a large cadre of loyal followers and commenters, I think reading a once a week blog might feel manageable to my readers.

This week, the logic behind not posting on Monday took on less the quality of logic and more the quality of derailment. I was supposed to be on a direct flight back from a family wedding on Sunday evening. The flight was well-timed: I was to arrive at 9PM, be in bed at 10PM, and up and at ‘em, bright eyed and bushy tailed on Monday morning. Well. Arriving at the airport on Sunday to discover that the flight had been canceled (yes, yes, I know I could have checked my flight status online, or on my phone, or by calling, and no I didn’t…) put a serious crimp in my plans. I don’t work well on the road unless I know I’m going to have to and make specific arrangements. Working on the road, for me, requires what Joan Bolker calls “parking on a downhill slope.” They suggest leaving yourself relatively clear and easy tasks at the end of a work day, on the theory that that will make work easier to start the next morning. (There were surely days of dissertation writing that felt amazingly like the time in 1995 I had to drive from Boston to NYC with no alternator and thus  no battery. Downhill slopes all the way!) If I have to set myself a task and do the task, it’s unlikely that I’ll be very productive on the road.

Monday, Monday…

But that leaves me here, on my surrogate Monday morning, feeling like I have three days of work undone, and a full day of work to do in front of me. Which put me in the mind of Covey, Merrill, and Merrill’s matrix of important and urgent. Wikipedia links to a useful graphic of their concept. Losing a day of work, to anything–airplanes, emergencies, the flu–seems to slam everything I have upcoming to do right into the “urgent-and-important” quadrant, even when it’s not strictly speaking true.

Merrill Covey Matrix

Merrill Covey Matrix

Reflecting back on my three-part series on the profession, I note that I only really wrote a short note, more of a rant, for the teaching section. I think this is indicative of something. More so than scholarship and service, teaching can hop up into quadrant one very easily–and sometimes deservedly so. Sometimes students need your attention and sometimes they need it now. Of course, the more planning and focus you can give in quadrant two to teaching, the less likely it is that teaching becomes an emergency. However, teaching is a world of hard deadlines and unexpected crises. If class is not planned, you can’t get just a few more hours to work on the plan. If half your class is out with the flu, you can’t very well just pretend it didn’t happen.

So today is a day when I will try to manage my time carefully, putting out fires where I need to, but trying not to mistake interruptions and distractions for fires. I teach tomorrow morning at 8:30–that’s a hard deadline I can’t ignore. I have a conference call today at noon–ditto. But to do my best work here, I can’t only focus on the deadlines that are urgent.

I’ll leave you with some references. The first dissertation book I ever read, and the origin of the “downhill slope” theory.

Bolker, Joan. Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day: A Guide to Starting, Revising, and Finishing Your Doctoral Thesis. New York: Holt, 1998.

And the book that originated the matrix on the right. I haven’t actually read First Things First, but I have seen the matrix often enough that I finally looked up its origin.

Stephen Covey, A. Roger Merrill, Rebecca R. Merrill, First Things First: To Live, to Love, to Learn, to Leave a Legacy. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994.

Posted in Profession, rumination, teaching.

Tagged with .